Client Support Associate
This is a mid-senior role at least – major misalignment between title/responsibilities and requirements.
Roles requiring you to work a standard 40 hours per week, regardless of permanent or temporary employee status.
This is a mid-senior role at least – major misalignment between title/responsibilities and requirements.
So much casual (and occasionally weirdly aggressive) ableism in this job listing. Also, the video on their careers page is 1) a product sales pitch, and 2) all dudes. Is the entire leadership team just dudes?
I have many concerns. That the title of the role doesn't match the title in the job description. The ridiculous salary. That the company has no Careers page and the role is only listed on LinkedIn. The stability/longevity of a company staking money on other people playing video games.
Same deal as with the Customer Success Manager – it's almost the exact same listing, including the degree requirements/GPA question, which seems like even more of a red flag.
There's an identical role open for San Francisco on Checkr's Jobs page.
Quora says they value diversity and want individuals of all backgrounds to apply but then they disadvantage those folks in salary negotiations by not volunteering even a base comp. Let's stop letting companies get away with this empty, spineless talk, huh?
Support seems to report to Sales, which makes me twitch.
I'm curious as to why this isn't a Director or Head of-level role when the description says that "Petvisor is the holding company for several subsidiaries [...] This is an exciting employment opportunity with responsibilities spanning the portfolio of companies."
This job was so close to making it in Green Means Go! Unfortunately, they listed "competitive" comp without actually giving a number, so it missed out. Sad.
Title/seniority are misaligned with the responsibilities of the role. Lots of flags in the "Who you are" section which makes me think this role would not be well supported.
This job description is wacky. Some of the responsibilities are reasonable for a role at this level, and some are most definitely not.
Overall, I like this company's approach to job descriptions. Of the few I've read, all were carefully and thoughtfully written, focusing on the skills and qualities needed for a candidate to be successful without being obnoxious.
I waffled on where this one should go (BINGO or Seriously, Maybe Don't). There's no Careers page, just a perfunctory EO statement at the bottom of their Jobs page along with a frankly alarming Values statement.
I'll take "What job description was written by AI?" for $400, Alex.
This job was this close to making it into Green Means Go, but there’s a misalignment between the duties of the position and the job title, so alas, into this category it goes.
As Director of Product Support, you’ll lead a team of knowledgeable and dedicated associates and managers in their work to support and grow our creators’ businesses while maintaining performance KPIs.
This one is listed under two different titles for a total of 4 times on their website. Not sure what’s up with that.
Job application is through Workday. My condolences.
This job is on Otta but isn’t listed on the company's website. But considering the Careers page is super bare-bones, that doesn’t necessarily mean anything.
$53k for a non-entry level, very technical role is laughable. The duties of the role and the title are also misaligned. And yes, again with the “not typical for offers to be made at or near the top of the [salary] range.”