Technical Support Engineer (L5)
Seems great, and the salary is amazing.
Roles that allow you to work full-time from your home or other location determined by you.
Seems great, and the salary is amazing.
The role itself seems fine, but the salary range is very wide, and the low end is way too low for a Lead role (especially at a company like Netflix). I don't think that's enough to put it in Tread Carefully, but I would ask about it if I were a candidate.
Seems like a pretty straightforward role with no major flags. The salary is, of course, Netflix generous.
Seems fine, very corporate, but they're honest about that. Benefits are fine; pay is mostly okay – I think the low end is a little too low for a senior role, but not so low that it's a major flag.
Seems good! No major flags and the benefits are great. Salary seems a little on the low side for a Senior Customer Success Manager, but if it's just a base salary with commission, it could be great.
I don't think they really know why they're hiring a Director of Support, which will likely make actually working in this role unpleasant, to say the least.
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean, but you should NEVER EVER take on risk on behalf of the company employing you unless you're, like, a firefighter or something. Which this is very much not.
I think it would probably be fine, except there's no salary transparency, so into Tread Carefully it goes. Womp Womp.
These companies do know that no one's forcing them to build their cultures 20,000 leagues under the sea, right? Come out of the water. It's nicer up here.
No major flags, Zuora seems to have a good grasp of what they want this position to accomplish, and the salary is excellent. Happy to put this in Eh, It's Probably Fine!
No salary transparency and some interesting culture signals put this in Tread Carefully.
Well, we're certainly building a narrative here, aren't we?
Man, I really want to put this in Eh, It's Probably Fine, but alas, they claim a competitive salary without then sharing the salary. So – well, you know how this ends.
It's our job as leadership to create an environment of respect for our customer support teams among our customers. If things are so bad that you have to specify "professional resilience" in your candidates, that's a failure of leadership and the company, not in potential candidates.
I understand that it's customary for there not to be salary transparency in international roles, but I refuse to excuse companies simply because they're not required to have it, *especially* when they claim to offer competitive salaries.
This one is reader-submitted, and y'all. We're whipping out "unclear if you're joining a cult or a company" for maybe the first time ever, and I HAVEN'T EVEN LOOKED AT A JOB LISTING YET.
I debated on whether to rate this one as Tread Carefully or BINGO, and decided on BINGO because of the EEO statement.
This job was fine, fine, mostly fine until we hit the last bits of it, and then it started telling one hell of a story.
I'm on the fence about Drata's "rules" – on the one hand I appreciate the rules are highly visible and clear. But there are also more elements of toxic startup philosophy than I am personally comfortable with.
I know this is a bit outside Support knowledge work, but I think it'd be a good fit for CX folks. The position seems fine, and the pay is great.
Nothing in particular is jumping out at me, but I confess I did skim. Did I mention it's long? Also that salary is as wide as the JD is verbose. One might say comically so.
I can tell you that I think they're asking too much from a Manager-level role, and I think the evolution in their Support approach is a bad signal for the function and the company's future. Tread Carefully.
On the one hand, the company has obviously put a lot of effort into thoughtful recruitment and in employee benefits. On the other, there are some flags here that I'd ask about.
Reading through the job description, the title seems misleading—this feels more like an AI content automation position than a Knowledge & Education one.